EKSISTENSI KOMISI YUDISIAL DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945
Kata Kunci:
existensi, supporting institutions, judicial commissionsAbstrak
One the most important effort to be mode in order to maintain the honor and dignity of judges in the judiciary in a country is to convene or create a power that can supervise it which itself is separate from the supervised authority or an external party from the supervised party. The judicial commission was formed in order to maintain the authority and dignity of judges, as well as to make preventive efforts so that judges do not violate the code ethics that could undermine public trusrt in them. The judicial commission as the externally supervises judges as stipulated by the 1945 Constitution makes it necessary to work extra and be careful. The position and function of the Judicial Commission which is clear and has legal consequences but is only considered as a Supporting Institution and is not comprehensive because of its function object. From this background, the following problems can be formulated: What is the exixtence of the Judicial Commission in the Indonesian constitutional system based on the 1945 Constitution?, What is the function of the Judicial Commission in the Indonesian constitutional system based on the 1945 Constitution ?.
From this study the authors conclude that the existence of the Judicial Commission as a state institution is mentioned in the 1945 Constitution is mentioned in the 1945 Constitution Article 24A paragraph (3) and Article 24B which explains the authority of the Judicial Commission, that the Judicial Commission has the authority to nominate candidates for Supreme Court judges, and uphold honor, nobility dignity, as well as the behavior of judges and finally the Judicial Commission is independent, has a legal basis and constitutionally the Judicial Commission is not a Supporting Institution in nature but equal to other state institutions and considering that constitutionally Supporting Institution are completely unknown. Seeing the existence and functions of the Judicial Commission which has been clearly stated in the 1945Constitution and has the authority which has also been celearly defined in the 1945 Constitutio, and added to Law Number 22 of 2004 concerning the Judicial Commission and Law Number 18 of 2011 concerning Amandments to Law Number 22 of 2004 concerning the Judicial Commission, the supervisory function carried out by the Judicial Commission is based on law which gives legimacy to its existence as one of the state administrators (state institutions) and the functions carried out by the Judicial Commission and its function as supervisor of judges and enforce of the honor of nobility and the code of ethics of judge, and this was indeed different before the Judicial Commission was held, precisely during the old order and the new order. The Judicial Commission was held due to the emergence of distrust and the great hope for the purity and cleanness of the judicial power from violations and is also inseparable from the judges themselves, the presence of the Judicial Commission has only been realized after everal years of reform in this country, so it is hoped that the presence of the Judicial Commission will be true-can actually maintain and keep it controlled and trusted by the public.
Referensi
Amran Suadi, Sistem Pengawasan Badan Peradilan di Indonesia, Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 2014.
Abintoro Prakoso, Hukum dan Psikologi Hukum, Laksbang Grafika, Yogyakarta, 2014.
Ahmad Sukardja, Piagam Madinah dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945, Kajian Perbandingan Tentang Dasar Hidup Bersama Dalam Masyarakat Yang Majemuk, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2014.
Ahmad Sukardja, Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Adminstrasi Negara Dalam Perspekti fFikih Siyasah, Sinar Garfika, Jakarta, 2012.
Ahmad Sukardja dan Mujar Ibnu Abdullah, Tiga Kategori Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2012.
A Rahman Zainuddin, Kekuasaan dan Negara Pemikiran Politik Ibnu Khaldun, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 1992.
Abdullah Ad-Dumaiji, Imamah ‘Uzhmah Konsep Kepemimpinan Dalam Islam, Ummul Qura, Jakarta, 2016.
Binsar M. Gultom, Pandangan Kritis Seorang Hakim dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2012.
Bambang Sunggono, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2006.
Cholid Narbuko dan Abu Achmadi, Metodologi Penelitian, Alfabeta, Jakarta, 2012.
Deliar Noer, PemikiranPolitik di Negeri Barat, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 1978.
Gery Ismanto dkk, Pendidikan Pancasila, Mulia Indah Kemala, Pekanbaru, 2013.
Hotma P. Sibue, Asas Negara Hukum, Peraturan Kebijakan dan Asas-asas Umum Pemerintahan Yang Baik, Erlangga, Jakarta, 2010.
Inu Kencana Syafi’i, Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2011.
IbnuSina Chandra Negara, Fungsi Falsafah Negara Dalam Konsep Negara Hukum, Jurnal CitaHukum, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah, Jakarta, 2014.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2012.
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2012.
J. H. Rapar, Filsafat Politik Aristoteles Seri Filsafat Politik,. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 1993.
Junaiyah H. Matalunggui, Bahasa Indonesia Untuk Bidang Hukum dan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, Grasindo, Jakarta, 2013.
KomisiYudisial Republik Indonesia, Optimalisasi Wewenang Komisi Yudisial dalam Mewujudkan Hakim Berintegritas, Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, Jakarta, 2016.
Komisi Yudisial Indonesia, Mengenal Lebih Dekat Komisi Yudisial, Pusat Data dan Layanan Informasi Komisi Yudisial, 2012.
KacungMarijan, SistemPolitik Indonesia, Konsolidasi Demokrasi Pasca-Orde Baru, Kencana, 2011.
MexasasaiIndra, Urgensi Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Melalui Mekanisme Judicial review, Jurnal Konstitusi, BKK Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, 2011
Moh.Mahfud MD, Konstitusi Dan Hukum Dalam KontroversiIsu, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2012.
Moh.Mahfud MD, Politik Hukum di Indonesia, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2012.
Moh.Mahfud MD, Perdebatan Hukum Tata Negara Pasca Amandemen Konstitusi, Rajawali Pers, Jakarta, 2011.
Muhammad Tahir Azhary, Negara Hukum, Suatu Studi Tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya Dilihat Dari Segi Hukum Islam, Implementasinya Pada Periode Negara Madinah Dan Masa Kini, Kencana, Jakarta, 2010.
Mucshin, Kekuasaan Kehakiman yang Merdeka, UNTAG Press, Subaya, 2008.
Masdar FardiMas’udi, Syarah Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Perspektif Islam, Pustaka Alvabet, Jakarta, 2013.
Patrialis Akbar, Lembaga-Lembaga Negara Menurut UUD NRI Tahun 1945, SinarGrafika, Jakarta, 2013.
Pilipus M. Hadjon, Lembaga Tertinggi dan Lembaga-Lembaga Tinggi Negara Menurut UUD 1945, Bina Ilmu, Surabaya, 1992.
Refly Harun, dkk (editor), menjaga denyut Konstitusi, Refleksi Satu Tahun Mahkamah Konstitusi, Konstitusi Press, Jakarta, 2004.
Ridwan HR, Hukum Administras Negara, Rajawali Pers,Jakarta, 2014.
Satjipto Raharjo, Sisi lain dari Hukum Indonesia, Buku Kompas, Jakarta, 2003.
Satjipto Raharjo, Biarkan Hukum Mengalir. Kompas, Jakarta, 2008.
Suratman dan Phillips Dillah, Metode Peneltian Hukum, Alfabeta, Bandung, 2014.
Suparto, Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang PemiluSerentak, Dari Inkonsistensi Ke Pelanggaran Kode Etik, Jakarta, Bina Karya, 2016.
Taufiqurrahman Syahuri, Tafsir Konstitusi Berbagai Aspek Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta, 2011.
Teguh Prasetyo dan Abdul Halim Barkatullah, Filsafat, Teori, dan Ilmu Hukum, Pemikiran Menuju Masyarakat Yang Berkeadilan dan Bermartabat, Rajawali Press, Jakarta, 2012.
Titik TriwulanTutik, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Amandemen Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, Cerdas Pustaka, Jakarta, 2008.
Soehino, Ilmu Negara, Liberty Yogyakarta:Yogyakarta, 2005.
Wira Atma Hajri, Qua Vadis Negara Hukum dan Demokrasi Indonesia Ketika Negara Dijalankan di Alam Kepura-puraan, Genta Press, Yogyakarta, 2016.
Zainal Arifin Hoesein, Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia, Imperium, Yogyakarta, 2013.
Zainuddi Ali, Sosiologi Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2014.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 tentangKomisiYudisial.
Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2011 tentang perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2004 Tentang Komisi Yudisial.
Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 14 1985 Tentang Mahkamah Agung.
